Transgender Activism and Science: The Hostage Situation No One Wants to Talk About

Transgender activism and science are on a collision course.

Douglas Murray’s latest piece in the New York Post finally says what most people already know—but are too afraid to say out loud: the transgender movement isn’t just about identity. It’s about control.

Control of language. Control of institutions. And yes, control of science.

Murray, in his typically British, well-mannered way, describes how medical journals, universities, and researchers have been backed into corners by a screeching mob that equates facts with violence and disagreement with genocide.

He’s right. But let’s not sugarcoat it.

This isn’t a debate. It’s a hostage situation.

Even MIT Philosophers Are Afraid to Speak Freely

That fear Murray describes? It’s not theoretical. It’s real—and now it has a name.

This week, Alex Byrne, a professor of philosophy at MIT, revealed that he was one of the anonymous authors behind the largely ignored Department of Health and Human Services review on pediatric gender medicine, published last month. In a Washington Post op-ed, Byrne explained that he and eight others—many of them politically left of center—chose anonymity not because the evidence was unclear, but because the backlash would be swift and brutal.

Let that sink in.

“Medicalized treatment for pediatric gender dysphoria needs to be dispassionately scrutinized like any other area of medicine, no matter which side of the aisle is cheering it on.

But in the United States, it has not been.”

— Alex Byrne, co-author of @HHSGov comprehensive… pic.twitter.com/54Nj3CHQrK

— Do No Harm (@donoharm) June 26, 2025

Transgender Activism and Science: The Fallout for Telling the Truth

An MIT professor—tenured, credentialed, and respected—felt compelled to hide his identity just to say what Sweden and the U.K. already have: that medical transitions for minors are risky, under-studied, and ethically shaky.

Byrne didn’t write as an ideologue. He wrote as a philosopher, making a case that the science doesn’t justify the stakes. That’s not extremism. That’s ethics. And for telling the truth, he knew the mob would come.

Truth now comes with a cost. And if even MIT can’t shield a philosopher from the fallout, then what hope does the average parent or pediatrician have?

The review itself is considerate and moderate. It weighs up the actual evidence and simply suggests that American authorities should align with the emerging consensus among experts and politicians in Europe. Which is that things have been done in the name of treating “gender dysphoria” are a medical and ethical nightmare.

For over a decade now, the “be kind” brigade has been insisting that “trans” should be the next civil rights issue of our age.

No less a graveyard of thought than Time magazine had a cover in 2014 saying that transgender issues should be “America’s next civil rights frontier.”

That is a very loaded way to present a complex issue. – New York Post

📺 Watch This: Alex Byrne—the MIT philosophy professor and one of the voices behind the controversial HHS review—breaks down how academia is being transformed and silenced by the transgender activism wave:

Alex Byrne didn’t write anonymously out of cowardice—he did it to speak truth. Here, he lays it out himself: how academic freedom is being eroded, how dissent is branded a hate crime, and why elites are failing the very truth they claim to uphold.

Biology Doesn’t Care About Your Pronouns

Here’s the cold truth: if you were born male, no amount of hormones, surgery, or hashtags will make you female. You can cut, inject, rename, and “rebrand” all you want—but you’re not switching teams. You’re playing dress-up with a prescription pad.

The activists know this. That’s why they work so hard to silence anyone who says it.

They don’t want a conversation. They want obedience. And they’ve turned some of the most trusted scientific institutions into scared little mice, tiptoeing around transgender activism and science like it’s radioactive.

Who’s Really Being Protected?

We’re told all this censorship and cancellation is about protecting “vulnerable people.” The truth is that the only thing being protected is a narrative. A flimsy, fact-free, feelings-first narrative that falls apart the moment someone asks, “What does the data say?”

The moment you bring up bone density, cardiovascular risk, brain development, regret rates, and fertility loss, they start shrieking “transphobe” and reaching for the de-platform button.

If you have to bully scientists into silence, your movement isn’t progressive. It’s authoritarian.

What Douglas Murray Gets Exactly Right About Transgender Activism and Science

Murray points out the gutless institutions bending to this pressure. He’s being diplomatic. I’ll say it straight:

These people aren’t “confused.” They’re cowards.

Cowards who know the truth but stay quiet to keep their grants, their tenure, and their blue-check reputations. They’d rather lie with the mob than stand with the facts.

And the few who do speak out? They’re doxxed, smeared, fired, or worse. All in the name of “tolerance.”

We’re way past pronouns and bathrooms now. We’re talking about medical malpractice, social contagion, and the state-sponsored mutilation of confused kids. Let’s call that last part what it is when it involves minors: child abuse. And the media? They cheer it on like it’s a pride parade—when in reality, it’s a full-blown public health scandal.

And let’s not pretend this is just a grassroots movement. There’s money behind it—big money. When corporations like Nike are quietly bankrolling puberty blocker research, the goal isn’t truth. It’s narrative control. It’s science rebranded as PR.

Enough. Draw the Line.

If we can’t say that men are not women, then we can’t say anything. There is no truth if facts can be shouted down by feelings. There is no science if data must submit to dogma.

So here’s the line:

Biology is not hate speech.

Dissent is not violence.

Children are not experiments.

And science does not need a permission slip from activists.

Final Word

Douglas Murray is right to call this what it is: bullying disguised as compassion. But at this point, it’s more than just bullying. It’s institutional capture. It’s gaslighting on a national scale. Transgender activism and science are no longer coexisting—they’re in open conflict. It’s a cultural hijack, and we either push back now, or get used to pretending 2+2 = 5.

Some of us aren’t playing along.

Not for clicks. Not for comfort. And certainly not for applause.

At An Americanist, we’re not here to be polite. We’re here to tell the truth.

Feature Image: Created in Canva Pro