Lindsey Graham

Senate Seats Aren’t Family Heirlooms

When I saw the news that Governor Henry McMaster had appointed Lindsey Graham’s sister, Darline Graham Nordone, to temporarily fill his Senate seat, I had two thoughts almost simultaneously.

Is she qualified?

And why do we keep doing this?

When Family Becomes A Qualification

After reading about her background, I learned she has spent years serving on the South Carolina Commission for the Blind and working with people with disabilities. That’s meaningful public service, and I don’t want to dismiss it. But serving on a state commission isn’t the same thing as serving in the United States Senate. Out of millions of South Carolinians, was she truly the strongest choice, or did sharing Lindsey Graham’s last name help open the door?

Maybe she was the strongest choice. I honestly don’t know. But if I were making the appointment, the one group of people I’d probably cross off my list immediately would be close family members. Not because they couldn’t do the job, but because I’d want the appointment to stand on its own. I’d want people talking about the appointee’s experience, not wondering whether the last name helped seal the deal.

Someone had to fill the seat. I don’t have a problem with that. South Carolina deserves two senators until voters elect a replacement. My issue isn’t with making a temporary appointment. My issue is making that appointment from inside the family.

Maybe that’s why this has been nagging at me. Out of an entire state filled with judges, veterans, former legislators, business owners, educators, and civic leaders, the governor landed on the previous senator’s sister. I keep coming back to that because it feels like we’re becoming a little too comfortable with political families.

The Principle Still Applies

Republicans have spent years criticizing political dynasties, and I think we’ve been right to do it. We’ve questioned the Kennedys, the Bidens, the Bushes, and any number of families whose names seem to carry political influence from one generation to the next. If we’re going to believe that’s unhealthy for the country, then the principle ought to apply no matter whose last name we’re talking about.

Maybe that’s why this appointment bothers me more than I expected. It isn’t really about Darline Graham Nordone. She may represent South Carolina well, and I hope she does. It’s about the message these appointments send. Whether we mean to or not, they reinforce the idea that political power has a way of staying in the family.

No, this isn’t a monarchy. I know that. But every time a family member is appointed to replace another family member, I can’t help thinking we’ve drifted a little farther from what the Founders had in mind. We fought a revolution to reject the idea that political power should stay in one family. We probably shouldn’t be recreating a watered-down version of it.

I don’t know. Maybe I’m making too much of it. But these family appointments always leave me with the same feeling. They may be perfectly legal, but they never seem like the best look for a republic.

The voters will ultimately decide who represents South Carolina.

That’s exactly as it should be.

Feature Image: AI-generated illustration.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.